TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Ground "Base / Built-In" Skill Conflict Groups
Attribute Methodology
Ground Attacking Assistant PvP Rankings, Attribute Methodology (List Format)
Attacking Assistant Rankings @ 4-Yellow Specialties
Attacking Assistant Rankings @ 3-Orange Specialties
Attacking Assistant Rankings @ 3-Purple Specialties
Ground Reinforcing Assistant PvP Rankings, Attribute Methodology (List Format)
Reinforcing Assistant Rankings @ 4-Yellow Specialties
Reinforcing Assistant Rankings @ 3-Orange Specialties
Reinforcing Assistant Rankings @ 3-Purple Specialties
Related Articles
PART 6E
Introduction
Formatting & Scoring Methodology
Skill Book Restrictions
Ground Reinforcing PvP Rankings
Ground Reinforcing Lead PvP General Rankings
Ground Reinforcing Assistant PvP General Rankings
Ground Reinforcing PvP Combinations
Related Articles
INTRODUCTION
The new formatting should make it easier to find and compare Army General Combinations.
The Single and Double Dragon Combinations have been combined into one (1) list mostly because it's simpler and easier, but also because the way the game is set-up currently, the Double Dragon Pairs do NOT score higher than the Single Dragon Pairs.
High-end Players should be using separate Attacking and Reinforcing Marches for all four (4) troop types. If that's not possible, using a strong Reinforcing pair for Attacking is going to be much better than using either a strong Attacking pair for Reinforcing or using a mixed pair for both Attacking and Reinforcing.
Reinforcing Pair
Sweyn Forkbeard / Frigg
Attacking - A- (91.2% - 1339)
Reinforcing - A+ (100.0% - 1338)
Attacking Pair
Lu Xun / Suchet
Attacking - A+ (99.3% - 1458)
Reinforcing - D+ (60.2% - 752)
Mixed Pair
Frigg / Suchet
Attacking - A (94.3% - 1386)
Reinforcing - B- (79.2% - 1060)
A "High-end Player" is likely to be:
In an Alliance that is participating in Major League Battle of Challons (BoCH)
A March Setter or March Joiner in the hive
8B+ Power
VIP 18 or higher
FORMATTING & SCORING METHODOLOGY - v4.1.1
Formatting
Suchet (1108) / Lu Xun (361) - Grade: A+ (100.0% - 1469)
Lead Name (Lead Score) / Assistant Name (Assistant Score) - Grade: Letter Grade (Letter Grade Percentage - Total Score)
Scoring Methodology
The Attacking Lead Score includes the Four (4) Skill Book Score.
The Attacking Assistant General Score includes a Skill Book Penalty for preventing the pair from using a certain Skill Book. In rare instances, when two (2) Generals with the same Penalty (from the same BSC Group) are matched up, that Skill Book Penalty needs to be removed.
If that were written out in a formula, it would be:
TAS = ALS + AAS + PEN
TAS = Total Attacking Score
ALS = Attacking Lead General Score
AAS = Attacking Assistant General Score
I don't see Pyrrhus in any of the rankings, yet. Just wondering if you will be including him at some point? I was thinking of using him as an assistant to Elise because it looks like they are compatible, but would love to get your take on this combination:)
Are Robert the Bruce's In-City buffs active when he is reinforcing an alliance member's city? I'm considering developing the Robert the Bruce/Oda Nobunaga combo for reinforcing and was just wondering if his 4th Specialty Battle of Bannockburn In-city attack and HP buffs are still able to be utilized in that application. Please let me know if you know. Thank you:)
Why is Ludwig ranked lower as a lead when compared to Aurelian or Elise? His buffs seems to be better when compared to those two?
I see several places that you refer readers to the equipment scores as a place to derive the way the lead general scores are figured out, but there's one thing that is confusing me. How do you go from the armor attributes to the different scores for Attacking and Reinforcing? I can see how those _are_ different, but not how you come to the scores from the attributes. I'm guessing that you are weighing attack and defense differently for the two scores?
Hi
any views on Aurelian?